Skip to main content
Home
  • Research & insight
  • Events
  • News
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • BIM
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Housing, commercial & retail
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Public procurement
    • Transport
    • Digital Technology
    • Renewables & alternative
    • Oil & gas
    • Power
    • Nuclear
    • Water & utilities
    • PFI/PPP
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Qatar
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Research & insight
  • Events
  • News
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • BIM
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Housing, commercial & retail
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Public procurement
    • Transport
    • Digital Technology
    • Renewables & alternative
    • Oil & gas
    • Power
    • Nuclear
    • Water & utilities
    • PFI/PPP
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Qatar
  • Team
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Adjudication

3 May 2011 - Golden Ocean Group Ltd v (1) Salgaocar Mining Industries PVT Ltd (2) Mr Anil V. Salgaocar

Can a guarantee be formed by email or an email chain?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

27 April 2011 - Durham County Council v Jeremy Kendall (t/a HLB Architects)

What were the terms of the contract? Was the contract evidenced in writing?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

8 March 2011 - Immingham Storage Company Ltd v Clear plc

Was a contract concluded by the return of a signed quotation which included the words "A formal contract will then follow in due course"?

28 February 2011 - McCain Foods included Ltd v Eco-Tec (Europe)

Could the losses claimed be categorised as indirect, special, incidental or consequential and therefore fall within the exclusion clause?

11 February 2011 - James Andrew Robinson v P.E. Jones (Contractors) Ltd

Can a builder owe his client a concurrent duty of care in tort in relation to pure economic loss? On the facts of the case, did the contractors owe a duty to prevent pure economic loss?
  • Load more
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • Building Information Modelling (BIM)
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Construction
    • Energy
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Qatar
  • Our team
  • Research & insight
    • Newsletters
    • Articles & papers
    • Annual Review
    • Adjudication case notes
    • Past webinars & podcasts
    • Publications
    • Capability Brochure
  • Full sitemap
Print this page
Share this page
Stay in touch
Twitter
LinkedIn
Blog RSS

Register for newsletters

Sign up
 
 
The Times Best Law Firms 2025 logoThe Legal 500 Top Tier logo UK Chambers Ranking logo Winner: Legal Firm of the Year
© Fenwick Elliott LLP 2025 | Disclaimer | Privacy policy | Website feedback