Skip to main content
Home
  • Research & insight
  • Events
  • News
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • BIM
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Housing, commercial & retail
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Public procurement
    • Transport
    • Digital Technology
    • Renewables & alternative
    • Oil & gas
    • Power
    • Nuclear
    • Water & utilities
    • PFI/PPP
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Qatar
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Research & insight
  • Events
  • News
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • BIM
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Housing, commercial & retail
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Public procurement
    • Transport
    • Digital Technology
    • Renewables & alternative
    • Oil & gas
    • Power
    • Nuclear
    • Water & utilities
    • PFI/PPP
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Qatar
  • Team
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Adjudication

June 2007 - Lead Technical Services Ltd v CMS Medical Ltd

Was the contract really evidenced in writing?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

June 2007 - Regus (UK) Ltd v Epsot Solutions Ltd

Did the standard terms of contract restrict or exclude the right to claim for loss or business or profits?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

June 2007 - Peter Anthony Rennie v Westbury Homes (Holdings) Ltd (2007)

Was the option to purchase validly extended through correspondence?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

June 2007 - Connolly Ltd v Bellway Homes Ltd

What are the difficulties involved in rectifying contracts on the basis of mistake?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

May 2007 - Hart Investments Ltd v Terence Maurice Charles Fidler (t/a Terence Fidler Partnership) Larchpark Ltd (in liquidation)

If you are only employed in relation to the permanent works, are you under any duty to warn in respect of any obvious danger with the temporary works?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

  • Load more
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • Building Information Modelling (BIM)
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Construction
    • Energy
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Qatar
  • Our team
  • Research & insight
    • Newsletters
    • Articles & papers
    • Annual Review
    • Adjudication case notes
    • Past webinars & podcasts
    • Publications
    • Capability Brochure
  • Full sitemap
Print this page
Share this page
Stay in touch
Twitter
LinkedIn
Blog RSS

Register for newsletters

Sign up
 
 
The Times Best Law Firms 2025 logoThe Legal 500 Top Tier logo UK Chambers Ranking logo Winner: Legal Firm of the Year
© Fenwick Elliott LLP 2025 | Disclaimer | Privacy policy | Website feedback