Skip to main content
Home
  • Research & insight
  • Events
  • News
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • BIM
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Housing, commercial & retail
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Public procurement
    • Transport
    • Digital Technology
    • Renewables & alternative
    • Oil & gas
    • Power
    • Nuclear
    • Water & utilities
    • PFI/PPP
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Qatar
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Research & insight
  • Events
  • News
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • BIM
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Housing, commercial & retail
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Public procurement
    • Transport
    • Digital Technology
    • Renewables & alternative
    • Oil & gas
    • Power
    • Nuclear
    • Water & utilities
    • PFI/PPP
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Qatar
  • Team
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Adjudication

23 May 2008 - Mair v Arshad

Was the contractual payment mechanism "adequate"?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

16 May 2008 - Tyco Fire & Integrated Solutions v Rolls Royce Motor Cars

Was Tyco liable to Rolls Royce for damage to the project or was the damage covered by the joint names insurance policy provided for by the contract?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

2 May 2008 - Polymers Ltd v Imerys Minerals Ltd

Also the difficulties associated with proving that a product is unfit for purpose if that product has a number of different uses?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

11 April 2008 - Orange Personal Communications Services v Hoare Lea

What approach will the court take in relation to questions regarding the (non) compliance of the pre-action protocol?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

15 February 2008 - Harris Calnan Construction Co Ltd v Ridgewood (Kensington) Ltd

Did the Letter of Intent amount to a contract in writing for the purposes of the HGCRA?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

  • Load more
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • Building Information Modelling (BIM)
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Construction
    • Energy
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Qatar
  • Our team
  • Research & insight
    • Newsletters
    • Articles & papers
    • Annual Review
    • Adjudication case notes
    • Past webinars & podcasts
    • Publications
    • Capability Brochure
  • Full sitemap
Print this page
Share this page
Stay in touch
Twitter
LinkedIn
Blog RSS

Register for newsletters

Sign up
 
 
The Times Best Law Firms 2025 logoThe Legal 500 Top Tier logo UK Chambers Ranking logo Winner: Legal Firm of the Year
© Fenwick Elliott LLP 2025 | Disclaimer | Privacy policy | Website feedback