Adjudication

12 October 2009 – Hart v Smith & Smith

Could the Smiths set off their claim for LADs against a decision made in a previous adjudication?

Was the dispute referred to adjudication the same or substantially the same as the dispute dealt with in the previous adjudication?

To what extent should the TCC intervene in connection with potential breaches of the rules of natural justice in adjudication enforcement cases?

Was the adjudicator validly appointed?

How will the courts deal with two adjudication decisions which decided different things but which might impact upon one another?

If you would like to receive a digital version of our newsletters please complete the subscription form.