Had there been a breach of the rules of natural justice by the adjudicator as a result of the methodology he had adopted, which had not been commented on by the parties.
Click to download PDF1 August 2011 - Profile Projects Ltd v Elmwood (Glasgow) Ltd
Did the Tolent clause render the adjudication clause ineffective? If the adjudication clause did conflict with section 108 then was the whole of the Scheme for Construction Contracts (Scotland) 1998 implied into the sub-contract instead?
18 July 2011 - Lanes Group Plc v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd
Was the Referring Party entitled to start the adjudication again, before another adjudicator, where it had failed to pursue the adjudication the first time around? Was there apparent bias?
7 July 2011 - Urang Commercial Ltd v (1) Century Investments Ltd (2) Eclipse Hotels (Luton) Ltd
Was the adjudicator wrong in deciding that in the absence of a withholding notice each Defendant could not deploy its counterclaim as a defence to Urang’s claims in the adjudication?
7 January 2011 - Redwing Construction Ltd v Mr Charles Wishart
Had an issue relating to the Contract Fee been settled by the adjudicator’s Decision in Adjudication Number 1? If so what did that mean when the same issue was raised in Adjudication Number 2?