Skip to main content
Home
  • Research & insight
  • Events
  • News
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • BIM
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Housing, commercial & retail
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Public procurement
    • Transport
    • Digital Technology
    • Renewables & alternative
    • Oil & gas
    • Power
    • Nuclear
    • Water & utilities
    • PFI/PPP
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Qatar
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Research & insight
  • Events
  • News
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • BIM
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Housing, commercial & retail
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Public procurement
    • Transport
    • Digital Technology
    • Renewables & alternative
    • Oil & gas
    • Power
    • Nuclear
    • Water & utilities
    • PFI/PPP
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Qatar
  • Team
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Adjudication

24 October 2008 - Benfield Construction v Trudson

What should the court consider if it is being asked to decide whether a dispute referred to adjudication is the same or substantially the same as one that has been previously referred and decided?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

10 October 2008 – Birmingham Council v Paddison Construction Ltd

Was the dispute referred to the second adjudicator the same or substantially the same as the dispute which had been previously referred and decided

PDF logoClick to download PDF

5 September 2008 - CJP Builders v William Verry Ltd

Did the adjudicator breach the rules of natural justice when he disregarded a late response served outside the time for service stipulated in the contract?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

29 August 2008 - Makers UK Ltd v The Mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Camden

Can a party contact a potential adjudicator prior to their appointment? Would such an action amount to apparent bias?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

9 May 2008 Edenbooth Ltd v CRE No. 8 Developments Ltd

Was the adjudication process unfair on the basis that the defendant was obliged to put in submissions within a short period of time when he had not been able to take advice from those from whom he wished to seek assistance?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

  • Load more
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • Building Information Modelling (BIM)
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Construction
    • Energy
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Qatar
  • Our team
  • Research & insight
    • Newsletters
    • Articles & papers
    • Annual Review
    • Adjudication case notes
    • Past webinars & podcasts
    • Publications
    • Capability Brochure
  • Full sitemap
Print this page
Share this page
Stay in touch
Twitter
LinkedIn
Blog RSS

Register for newsletters

Sign up
 
 
The Times Best Law Firms 2025 logoThe Legal 500 Top Tier logo UK Chambers Ranking logo Winner: Legal Firm of the Year
© Fenwick Elliott LLP 2025 | Disclaimer | Privacy policy | Website feedback