Skip to main content
Home
  • Research & insight
  • Events
  • News
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • BIM
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Housing, commercial & retail
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Public procurement
    • Transport
    • Digital Technology
    • Renewables & alternative
    • Oil & gas
    • Power
    • Nuclear
    • Water & utilities
    • PFI/PPP
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Qatar
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Research & insight
  • Events
  • News
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • BIM
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Housing, commercial & retail
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Leisure
    • Infrastructure
    • Public procurement
    • Transport
    • Digital Technology
    • Renewables & alternative
    • Oil & gas
    • Power
    • Nuclear
    • Water & utilities
    • PFI/PPP
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Qatar
  • Team
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Adjudication

22 June 2010 - Yuanda (UK) Gear Co Ltd v WW Gear Construction Ltd

Was the contractual rate of interest a substantial remedy, or would a higher rate apply?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

19 May 2010 - Speymill Contracts Ltd v Eric Baskind

How should parties proceed when allegations of fraud are raised during the adjudication or enforcement process?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

14 May 2010 - Rok Building Ltd v Celtic Composting Systems Ltd (No. 2)

Had the adjudicator applied the slip rule correctly?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

1 April 2010 - SG South Ltd v Swan Yard (Cirencester) Ltd

Was there an agreement in writing? Did Swan Yard's failure to raise this issue during adjudication proceedings mean that they were precluded from so doing when it came to enforcement proceedings before the TCC?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

31 March 2010 - Amec Group Ltd v Thames Water Utilities Ltd

To what extent does an adjudicator have to consider late submissions?

PDF logoClick to download PDF

  • Load more
  • Services
    • Project support
    • Contracts & documentation
    • Procurement
    • Dispute resolution
    • Sustainability
    • Building Information Modelling (BIM)
    • Health & safety
  • Experience
    • Construction
    • Energy
  • International
    • CIS
    • Central & Eastern Europe
    • Korea
    • Middle East
    • North Africa
    • Turkey
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Qatar
  • Our team
  • Research & insight
    • Newsletters
    • Articles & papers
    • Annual Review
    • Adjudication case notes
    • Past webinars & podcasts
    • Publications
    • Capability Brochure
  • Full sitemap
Print this page
Share this page
Stay in touch
Twitter
LinkedIn
Blog RSS

Register for newsletters

Sign up
 
 
The Times Best Law Firms 2025 logoThe Legal 500 Top Tier logo UK Chambers Ranking logo Winner: Legal Firm of the Year
© Fenwick Elliott LLP 2025 | Disclaimer | Privacy policy | Website feedback