Baltimore Wharf SLP v Ballymore Properties Ltd
Ted Lowery looks at a case that examines whether a settlement agreement became binding.
Content types
Sectors
Services
Regions
Contracts
Authors
Ted Lowery looks at a case that examines whether a settlement agreement became binding.
Ted Lowery considers an unsuccessful attempt to expand jurisdictional arguments at enforcement.
As Ted Lowery and Rich Burton discuss, the approach of PFI contract expiry frequently generates significant friction between public bodies and project companies.
Ted Lowery considers a case in which, unusually, the court entertained an application for summary judgment on issues only.
Ted Lowery considers the Court of Appeal’s disposal of a dispute over the income sharing mechanism in a PFI contract for waste processing.
Ted Lowery considers a case involving an Anglo-Scottish battle (of forms).
Ted Lowery looks at a judgment concerning a settlement agreement that left things unsettled.
Ted Lowery looks at a decision concerning confusing contract documents.
Ted Lowery provides analysis on a decision at the London Stadium that was overturned on review.
Ted Lowery looks at a dispute over design obligations that rankled with the judge.
In almost every PFI and PPP project, the principal contracts will include bespoke dispute resolution procedures, which typically provide mechanisms for sequential and escalating processes and the determination of what are usually characterised as “related disputes”. Ted Lowery reviews a case which emphasises that these mechanisms are not always straightforward.
Ted Lowery looks at a Scottish decision concerning serial adjudications.