Sutton and East Surrey Water plc v Monarch Chemicals Ltd & Muztrans Limited
Ted Lowery considers a claim for a Civil Liability Act contribution brought in consequence of a chemicals delivery blunder that left the protagonists under a cloud.
Content types
Sectors
Services
Regions
Contracts
Authors
Ted Lowery considers a claim for a Civil Liability Act contribution brought in consequence of a chemicals delivery blunder that left the protagonists under a cloud.
Had the parties agreed an extension of time which the adjudicator failed to take account of?
Had the adjudicator departed from the parties’ submissions and/or decided the dispute on a basis which they did not have an adequate opportunity to deal with?
June’s Dispatch looks at natural justice, adjudicators departing from submissions and the formalities needed to agree an extension of time (EOT).
Fenwick Elliott Partner Ben Smith was joined by Mathias Cheung of Atkin Chambers for a practical case law update which examined what recent decisions mean for parties drafting and administering construction contracts.
Ted Lowery considers a case concerning a disputed settlement agreement that was said to have produced an absurd outcome.
How will the court determine whether a person “intends to occupy” the property: a key part of the test as to the whether or not the residential occupier exemption will apply to an adjudication?
What is the test the court will apply in determining whether or not the contents of a withholding notice comply with the requirements of the Housing Grants Act?
May’s Dispatch looks at withholding (or pay less) notices, and when the residential occupier exemption might prevent an attempted adjudication.
In Part 2 of their analysis of delay claims in data centre construction, Fenwick Elliott partner Edward Foyle and GBSQD partner Ahmed Elkordy share guidance on what to do when the delays occur, how to manage delays on the project and how to make a claim in respect of critical delay caused.
Did a letter form a binding agreement between the parties or was it simply part of an exchange which was subject to contract?
Following a creditors’ voluntary liquidation, could a claiming party make a call on a personal guarantee signed by a former director?