Thomas-Fredric’s (Construction) Ltd v Wilson

The Court of Appeal said that a letter must provide clear evidence of the contracting party’s identity if it is to be used to evidence a contract in writing as required by section 107(2)(c) of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act. Equally, there must be clear evidence that all parties concerned were in agreement if a party claims that an adjudicator has been asked to make a binding decision as to his jurisdiction. The Court of Appeal followed the decision of His Honour Judge Gillilland QC in Nordot v Siemens. Click to download PDF