Our collective thoughts

Posted November 11, 2024 | Published in Procurement

Constructing the Gold Standard: Needed more than ever? [1]

Claire King takes a closer look at “Constructing the Gold Standard” (the “Review”), a 24-point plan designed to help clients and their supply chain optimise the procurement process and deliver the best outcomes possible. In this blog, Claire shares insight from a recent Fenwick Elliott panel discussion which featured Professor David Mosey, who led the Review.

Late payments: you’re really on thin ice now [3]

Paul Smylie reports on the Court of Appeals decision in Providence Building Services Ltd v Hexagon Housing Association Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 962, which held that the Contractor was entitled to terminate its employment based on just two late payments, each of which was rectified within 14 days.

UK Supreme Court finds that collateral warranties are not a construction contract [5]

Adele Parsons reports on the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Ltd v Simply Construct (UK) LLP [2024] UKSC 23, which has provided welcome guidance on whether a collateral warranty is a “construction contract” as defined by the Construction Act.

Settlement Agreements: words to the wise [7]

In this blog post, Katherine Butler discusses the recent TCC decision, which sets out a useful summary of the law relating to the construction of settlement terms. The judgment serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the importance of the wording used in settlement agreements.

Less of a slip, more of a stumble – when Adjudicators exceed their jurisdiction under the Slip Rule [9]

In this blog post, Adele Parsons discusses the recent successful adjudication enforcement proceedings in the Technology & Construction Court. In his judgment, Mr Adrian Williamson KC, sitting as a High Court deputy judge, determined that the adjudicator had exceeded his jurisdiction in applying the Slip Rule.

Adjudication Round Up: nothing to declare… [10]

In this blog post, Katherine Butler looks at three recent decisions where the TCC has declined to give the remedies and/or declarations sought following adjudication awards being made. Whilst the three cases address different matters, the judgments all focus on the fairness of the outcome and offer reminders to parties that fairness and the overall merits of any particular claim or application are key considerations for the English Courts, balanced against strict legal entitlements.

Carry on Dissatisfied? Notices of Dissatisfaction and the NEC [11]

In this blog post, Claire King looks at the key issues parties must consider when issuing a Notice of Dissatisfaction, which must be issued within the requisite time frame of four weeks if a party wishes to avoid being bound by an adjudicator’s decision.