Did the inadequate fall mean the drain was not fit for purpose? Was the content and effect of an important conversation between the parties sufficient to exclude the implied warranty of fitness for purpose that would otherwise apply?
Links
[1] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_23-2011.pdf
[2] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_15-2011.pdf
[3] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_12-2011.pdf
[4] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_11-2011.pdf
[5] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_10-2011.pdf
[6] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/print/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/contract-issues?page=8