Published on Fenwick Elliott (https://www.fenwickelliott.com)

Home > Research & insight > Newsletters > Legal Briefing > Contract issues

Contract issues

16 August 2011 - Baylis Farms Ltd v R B Dymott Builders Ltd

Did the inadequate fall mean the drain was not fit for purpose? Was the content and effect of an important conversation between the parties sufficient to exclude the implied warranty of fitness for purpose that would otherwise apply?

PDF logoClick to download PDF [1]

6 June 2011 - Scottish Widows Services Ltd v Building Design Partnership

Did the terms of the collateral warranty preclude Scottish Services from recovering the costs of remedying defects in the building itself?

PDF logoClick to download PDF [2]

12 May 2011 - Simon Carves Ltd v Ensus UK Ltd

Could the injunction preventing Ensus from making a call on the performance bond be maintained in circumstances where there was no allegation of fraud?

PDF logoClick to download PDF [3]

3 May 2011 - Golden Ocean Group Ltd v (1) Salgaocar Mining Industries PVT Ltd (2) Mr Anil V. Salgaocar

Can a guarantee be formed by email or an email chain?

PDF logoClick to download PDF [4]

27 April 2011 - Durham County Council v Jeremy Kendall (t/a HLB Architects)

What were the terms of the contract? Was the contract evidenced in writing?

PDF logoClick to download PDF [5]

  • Load more [6]

Links
[1] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_23-2011.pdf [2] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_15-2011.pdf [3] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_12-2011.pdf [4] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_11-2011.pdf [5] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_10-2011.pdf [6] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/print/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/contract-issues?page=8