Ted Lowery considers the consequences of disregarding CPR Part 35.
Ted Lowery considers the consequences of disregarding CPR Part 35.
The impact of an arbitration clause upon a Part 8 application.
Was there sufficient evidence before the court to support the claimant’s hypotheses as to the causes of failure?
Should a claimant be entitled to default judgement on a claim that was dependent upon the outcome of separate proceedings?
Was the Claimant entitled to costs on an indemnity basis following a Part 36 offer to accept “95% of our client's claim for damages” even though this was an outcome that was not open to the court at trial?
Links
[1] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/2019/02
[2] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/february_2019_0.pdf
[3] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/2018/9
[4] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/september_2018.pdf
[5] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/2017/07
[6] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/september_2017.pdf
[7] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/2017/06
[8] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_aug_2017.pdf
[9] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/2016/02
[10] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_02_-_2016.pdf
[11] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/print/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/adr-arbitration-litigation?page=4