Where an adjudicator applies ISG vs Seevic to order payment of a final account application, can the valuation be challenged in a subsequent adjudication?
Where an adjudicator applies ISG vs Seevic to order payment of a final account application, can the valuation be challenged in a subsequent adjudication?
Should enforcement of the Second Decision be refused on the grounds advanced by Amey or if enforceable, should the Second Decision be severed to exclude the effect of the arithmetical error?
Had the parties agreed a contract which provided for adjudication?
Had the adjudicator been asked to consider a dispute that had been previously referred to adjudication?
Can a court enforce an order (here for the delivery up of documents) that an adjudicator has declined to make?
Links
[1] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/2016/06
[2] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_06_-_2016.pdf
[3] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/2016/05
[4] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_05_-_2016.pdf
[5] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/2016/03
[6] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_03_-_2016.pdf
[7] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/2016/01
[8] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_01_-_2016.pdf
[9] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/2015/16
[10] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/legal_briefing_16_-_2015.pdf
[11] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/print/research-insight/newsletters/legal-briefing/adjudication?page=4