Issue 252 - June 2021
Were the failings of the experts so serious as to justify their reports being excluded from the trial?
Issue 252 - June 2021
Were the failings of the experts so serious as to justify their reports being excluded from the trial?
Issue 252 - June 2021
Had there been an unreasonable failure to mediate? What was the effect of the adverse comments about the experts on costs?
Issue 251 - May 2021
Where did the expert evidence go wrong?
Issue 251 - May 2021
Did the experts understand the nature of the duty they owed to the court?
Issue 250 - April 2021
Did the claim plead the details of alleged cladding defects in sufficient detail?
Links
[1] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/archive/dana-uk-axle-freudenberg-fst
[2] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/dispatch_issue_252.pdf
[3] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/archive/beattie-passive-norse-canham-consulting-3
[4] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/archive/beattie-passive-norse-canham-consulting-2
[5] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/dispatch_issue_251.pdf
[6] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/archive/kang-pattar
[7] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/archive/naylor-roamquest
[8] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/dispatch_issue_250.pdf
[9] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/print/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/arbitration-litigation?page=6