Issue 56 - February 2005
Were O2 able to resist adjudication enforcement proceedings on the basis that there was no concluded contract between the parties?
Issue 56 - February 2005
Were O2 able to resist adjudication enforcement proceedings on the basis that there was no concluded contract between the parties?
Issue 55 - January 2005
Did size and complexity of the dispute between the parties mean that it could not be resolved fairly through adjudication?
Issue 55 - January 2005
Did the contract between the parties incorporate the terms of the JCT Form of Contract and thereby give the adjudicator jurisdiction to determine the dispute?
Issue 53 - November 2004
In the first case from New Zealand, the court had to decide what the effect was of not serving a payment schedule as required by the Construction Contracts Act?
Issue 53 - November 2004
This case provides guidance to adjudicators on the importance of letting parties know who they want to attend meetings and why.
Links
[1] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/docs/dispatch/Dispatch_issue_56.pdf
[2] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/docs/dispatch/Dispatch_issue_55.pdf
[3] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/docs/dispatch/Dispatch_issue_53.pdf
[4] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/print/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/adjudication?page=48