Issue 111 - September 2009
Were Capital's withholding notices sufficient to comply with section 111 of the HGCRA?
Issue 111 - September 2009
Were Capital's withholding notices sufficient to comply with section 111 of the HGCRA?
Issue 107 - May 2009
Were the criticisms of the reasons given (or not given) by the adjudicator justified?
Issue 106 - April 2009
Had the adjudicator considered all the issues raised by the parties during the adjudication process?
Issue 106 - April 2009
Were the Shaws’ residential occupiers, which would mean that the adjudication provisions of the Housing Grants Act would not apply to the dispute between the parties?
Issue 105 - March 2009
What are the principles which apply if a company, subject to a CVA, seeks to enforce an adjudicator's decision?
Links
[1] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/Dispatch_issue_111.pdf
[2] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/Dispatch_issue_107.pdf
[3] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/Dispatch_issue_106.pdf
[4] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/Dispatch_issue_105.pdf
[5] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/print/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/adjudication?page=35