Dispatch highlights some of the most important legal developments during the last month, relating to the building, engineering and energy sectors.
April's Dispatch looks at notices and whether a report was protected by the “without prejudice” rule.
Disclosure and Barring Service v Tata Consultancy Services Ltd [1]
To recover compensation for delays, did DBS have to comply with certain conditions precedent?
Mornington 2000 LLP (t/a Sterilab Services) v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2]
Was disclosure of an audit report protected by the without prejudice rule?
download (PDF 88K) April's Dispatch [3]
Adjudication [4] | Alternative Dispute Resolution [5] |
Arbitration & litigation [6] | Contract issues [7] |
Public procurement [8] | Other [9] |
Links
[1] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/archive/disclosure-and-barring-service-v-tata-consultancy-services-ltd
[2] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/archive/mornington-2000-llp-v-secretary-of-state-for-health-and-social-care
[3] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/sites/default/files/dispatch_issue_298.pdf
[4] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/adjudication
[5] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/alternative-dispute-resolution
[6] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/arbitration-litigation
[7] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/contract-issues
[8] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/public-procurement
[9] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/other
[10] https://www.fenwickelliott.com/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/archive